Six research and accountability tools — each one designed to compel action. From Eton to LAUSD, from court records to school board meetings. Every grade is sourced. Every claim is defensible.
Eton. Le Rosey. Lawrenceville. Harrow. Graded A–F on six dimensions of digital child safety — sourced exclusively from court records, inquest transcripts, and regulatory filings. No school self-reporting.
Eton: 4 documented staff criminal convictions. Le Rosey: live Swiss court proceedings. Lawrenceville: written admission of failure.
LAUSD. San Diego Unified. Long Beach. Graded on sextortion response protocols, phone policy, digital safety curriculum, and crisis infrastructure. Sourced from CDE CSSP filings.
Every graded district is a party to the social media MDL 3047 litigation. They are suing the platforms — this asks what their own protocol is.
Documented sextortion cases involving minors across the United States — sourced from DOJ press releases, FBI IC3 annual reports, and federal court records. Filter by state, platform, year, and outcome.
FBI IC3 received 26,718 sextortion complaints in 2023. This tracker documents the cases where platforms were the vector.
A downloadable, plain-language brief for parents — showing their school district's digital safety grade, the platforms most commonly used in local sextortion cases, and the five questions every parent should ask at the next school board meeting.
Designed to be printed and brought to school board meetings. Every claim is sourced. Every question is legally grounded.
A structured legal brief documenting the gap between what school districts are required to have in their Comprehensive School Safety Plans and what they actually publish — framed as a duty-of-care analysis.
California Education Code §32280 requires annual CSSP updates. This brief documents which districts are non-compliant and what that means for liability.
A school-level digital safety credit rating — measuring % of student population exposed to high-risk categories, incident clustering by grade/cohort, platform penetration by school, and repeat incident density. Sourced from NCMEC, FBI IC3, CDC YRBS, and state education filings.
Think credit rating for digital safety. Designed as a monetization lever: schools pay to see their full profile and get a remediation roadmap.
A structured 30-question survey for boarding school safeguarding leads — benchmarked against the six dimensions of the TeenAegis Report Card. Schools that complete the survey receive a preliminary grade and a gap analysis report.
Completion is voluntary. Results are confidential unless the school consents to publication. Designed to drive internal improvement, not public shaming.
All TeenAegis school intelligence products are graded using a proprietary server-side scoring model. Dimension weights and composite formulas are not published. Every underlying finding is sourced to a primary document — court record, regulatory inspection report, inquest transcript, or DOJ press release. No school self-reporting is used as evidence. Schools and districts may submit formal disputes with supporting documentation to [email protected]. TeenAegis accepts corrections and updates grades when material new information is verified.
© 2026 TeenAegis · Privacy Policy · Terms · Intelligence Hub