TeenAegis grades California's largest school districts on five dimensions of digital child safety — sextortion response protocols, phone and social media policy, digital safety curriculum, incident reporting transparency, and crisis response infrastructure. All data sourced from public CDE filings, district Comprehensive School Safety Plans (CSSPs), and verified reporting.
Context: Every district graded here is a party to the social media litigation against Meta, Google, Snap, and TikTok. They are suing the platforms for the harm — this report card asks what each district's own protocol is for responding to it.
LAUSD is one of 800+ CA districts suing social media platforms. Sextortion protocol exists but is not publicly documented in the CSSP.
Party to social media litigation. Digital safety curriculum updated 2024. Sextortion protocol not publicly available.
Party to social media litigation. No publicly available sextortion-specific protocol.
Party to social media litigation. Above-average digital safety curriculum. Published phone policy.
Party to social media litigation. Digital safety curriculum in place.
Party to social media litigation. Digital safety curriculum below state average. No published sextortion protocol.
Party to social media litigation. Digital safety curriculum in place. Sextortion protocol not publicly available.
Party to social media litigation. Below-average digital safety infrastructure. No published sextortion protocol.
Party to social media litigation. No published sextortion protocol.
Party to social media litigation. Digital safety curriculum below state average.
Data Sources: California Department of Education (CDE) Comprehensive School Safety Plans (CSSPs), district policy documents, and verified public reporting. NCES IDs sourced from the National Center for Education Statistics Common Core of Data. Districts may submit corrections to [email protected].
© 2026 TeenAegis · Privacy Policy · Terms · Intelligence Hub